Jump to content

Administrative divisions of medieval Serbia

From Tilcayo Cats, the lean encyclopaedia by Tilcayo Knowledge Systems

Administrative divisions of medieval Serbia refer to territorial-administrative units of the medieval Serbian states. The fundamental territorial unit was the župa ("county"), made up of many villages and often named after a river. Several župe made up a zemlja ("land") in the Nemanjić period (1166–1371). Other territorial units were vlasti ("rule"), governed by generals, and krajište ("frontier").

Early history

The Slavic settlement of the Balkans in the 6th- and 7th centuries destroyed the Eastern Roman (Byzantine) administrative apparatus in the Balkan provinces.[1] According to the Royal Frankish Annals, written in 822, the Serbs "are said to hold a great/large part of Dalmatia".[2] This means that the Serbs held a large part of the historical province of Dalmatia prior to the beginning of the 9th century.[2] Other parts of Dalmatia were held by the Croats.[2] The tribal names mentioned by De Administrando Imperio (DAI), that is Dokleans, Konavlians, Travunians, Zachumlians, and Narentines, were adopted following Slavic settlement, named after the environment, and were not original ethnic names, as opposed to that of the Serbs and Croats–which shows that the latter two were numerous and better organized, and absorbed lesser tribes.[3] In the beginning, the župan was the representative of tribal leadership, and Byzantine sources speak of "elder župans".[4] The DAI explains how among the South Slavs "Princes (archontas), as they say, these nations had non, but only zoupanous, elders (gerontas), as is the rule in the other Slavonic regions".[5] With the establishment of Serbian states in the Early Middle Ages, there was the ruler (knez or archon) as supreme leader, and several župan across the country, who held limited authority and territory (župa).[4]

According to De Administrando Imperio (DAI), "baptized Serbia" included the "inhabited cities" (kastra oikoumena) of Destinikon, Tzernabouskeï, Megyretous, Dresneïk, Lesnik and Salines, while the "small land" (chorion) of Bosnia, part of Serbia, had the cities of Katera and Desnik. Accordingly, Serbia proper originally included lands around rivers Lim, Tara, Piva, Ibar, West Morava, Upper Drina and Upper Bosna.[6] DAI further describes Pagania (between Cetina and Neretva[a]), Zachumlia (between Neretva and Dubrovnik[b]), Travunia and Konavle (between Dubrovnik and Kotor[c]), as Serb lands.[7] These were all part of the Serbian state at least by the beginning of the 10th century, while Travunija is explicitly mentioned as part of the Serbian state by the mid-9th century.[8] Duklja stretched from Kotor to towards Dyrrachion.[d] Duklja, Konavli, Travunija and Zahumlje bordered Serbia, which included Bosnia, "in the mountain parts (hinterland)".[7] The DAI shows that although regional division existed, as a whole, the Serbs ruled and lived in a notable part of the Balkans.[7] More information, apart from charters and hagiographies, about the territories is found in the Chronicle of the Priest of Duklja (LPD, c. 1300), which also make mention of an intermediate Podgorje ("below the mountains") between Primorje (Latin: Maritima, "by the sea", Zeta, Travunija, Zahumlje) and Zagorje or Serbia (Latin: Transmontanta, Surbia, "behind the mountains", Serbia and Bosnia), which is not found in other sources.[9] The Serbian state disintegrated in the second half of the 10th century, and was revived at the end of the 10th century with Duklja as the leading Serbian state, and in the 11th century all Serb lands except the Narentines came under it.[10] The Serbian political centre switched back to Serbia proper (called Raška in historiography) at the end of the 11th century with the Serbian–Byzantine conflict.[10] More information regarding territorial units follow from the 12th century.

Serbia under the Nemanjić

The traditional lands of the medieval Serbian states were Serbia proper (or "Serbian lands", srpske zemlje), Duklja (or "Zeta"), Zahumlje (or "Hum lands"), and Travunija. The maritime principalities were also grouped in charters, hagiographies and regnal titles as the "maritime lands" (morske zemlje, pomorske zemlje).[11]

The term župa ("county", pl. župe) was generally used in the Middle Ages for a settled and cultivated territorial unit with a set of administrative functions, made up of many villages.[12] The older župe were defined clearly geographically, but with expansion of the state and local government, this was later not always the case.[13] The majority of župe had a central administrative location (župski grad), while some small župe, part of larger units, did not have administrative functions.[14] For larger provinces, the term zemlja ("land") was also used, made up of several župe, but it is not to be confused with the term for the crown lands (i.e. srpske zemlje, found in regnal titles) which signified far larger territory.[14] At least by the time of King Stefan Milutin (r.  1282–1321), territories were given to military-civil governors (the nobility, vlastela), and were called država ("holding"), and these were generally larger than a single župa.[15]

zemlje
  • Raška zemlja, with the župe of Ras, Upper Ibar, Jelašnica, Sitnica, Upper and Lower Lab, and Držkovina.[14]
župe

Moravian Serbia and the Serbian Despotate

Despot Stefan Lazarević (r.  1389–1427) established vlasti, territorial-administrative units headed by a vojvoda (general) who held local military and civil power, and were generally seated in a fortified city which the vlast was named after.[39] The vlast was not established all over state territory.[39]

See also

Annotations

  1. ^
    In DAI, the Paganians/Narentines held three župe (Rastok, Mokro, Dalen), four cities (Makarska, Vrulja, Zaostrog and Gradac) and large islands (Mljet, Korčula, Hvar, Brač), which they had acquired in the 8th century.[44]
  2. ^
    In DAI, Zahumlje included Bona (Blagaj), Hum, Ston with Pelješac, Mokriskik (perhaps Mokro in the southwest Mostar sands), Josli (Ošlje), Galumainik (perhaps Glumina), Dobriskik (likely Dabar in the Dabar field [sr]).[18] The LPD mentions Ston, Popovo, Zapško or Zažablje, Luka on the Neretva, Dubrave.[18] Later mentions of Hum lands include Velika Gor (around Ljubuški), Goromita (Imotski), Večenike (Večerići, likely Mostar field).[18] All these were small županije presumably existing also before the time the LPD was written.[18]
  3. ^
    In DAI, Travunija and Konavli are spoken of as "one land", meaning they at some point early on were united.[18] Along the coast, the land stretched from Dubrovnik to Kotor, and included the cities of Trebinje, Vrm, Risan, Lukavete (Luka near Trebinje) and Zetlivi (Necvijeće).[18] According to the LPD, there were the following županije, Ljubomir, Fatnica, Rudine, Kruševica, Vrm, Risan, Dračevica, Konavli and Žrnovica (Župa dubrovačka).[18]
  4. ^
    In DAI, Duklja included the cities of Gradac, Novigrad and Lontodokla (all of unknown location), and stretched towards Lješ, Ulcinj and Bar.[20] Duklja took its name from the ruins of Diokleia.[20] According to the LPD, the province called Zeta included Luška (Lješkopolje), Podlužje (Žabljak), Kupelnik (east of Žabljak), Oblik (Taraboš), Prapratna (between Bar and Ulcinj), Crmnica (west shore of Lake Skadar), Grbalj, Cuceva (around Budva).[20]

References

  1. ↑ Blagojević 1983, p. 50.
  2. ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 Blagojević 1983, p. 51.
  3. ↑ Blagojević 1983, pp. 52–53.
  4. ↑ 4.0 4.1 Blagojević 2001, p. 14.
  5. ↑ Šarkić, Srđan (2023-04-20), "Organization of Power", A History of Serbian Mediaeval Law, Brill, pp. 137–192, ISBN 978-90-04-54385-0, retrieved 2025-09-17
  6. ↑ Dinić, Mihailo (1953). "VII poglavlje: Srpske zemlje u ranofeudalno doba (do XII. stoljeća)". Historija naroda Jugoslavije (in srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски). Zagreb: Školska knjiga. p. 245. Srbija je, po njemu, obuhvaćala tada planinske predjele oko Lima, gornje Drine (s porječjem Pive i Tare), Ibra i zapadne Morave (kasniji izvori upotrebljavaju za te krajeve i naziv Raška), dalje područje Sol (oko Tuzle) i Bosnu, po kojom se podrazumijevala samo oblast oko gornjeg toka rijeke Bosne.
  7. ↑ 7.0 7.1 7.2 Blagojević 1983, p. 53.
  8. ↑ Blagojević 1983, p. 60.
  9. ↑ Blagojević 1983, pp. 56, 58.
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 Blagojević 1983, pp. 65–66.
  11. ↑ Blagojević 1983, p. 69.
  12. ↑ Katić & Vojvodić 2020, p. 129.
  13. ↑ Katić & Vojvodić 2020, p. 129, Blagojević 1992, p. 68
  14. ↑ 14.0 14.1 14.2 Katić & Vojvodić 2020, p. 130.
  15. ↑ Ivanović 2023, p. 25.
  16. ↑ 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.3 16.4 16.5 16.6 16.7 16.8 Mišić 2014, p. 21.
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 Blagojević 1983, p. 74.
  18. ↑ 18.00 18.01 18.02 18.03 18.04 18.05 18.06 18.07 18.08 18.09 18.10 18.11 18.12 18.13 18.14 18.15 18.16 Blagojević 1983, p. 54.
  19. ↑ 19.0 19.1 19.2 Blagojević 1983, pp. 69–70.
  20. ↑ 20.00 20.01 20.02 20.03 20.04 20.05 20.06 20.07 20.08 20.09 20.10 20.11 20.12 20.13 20.14 20.15 20.16 20.17 20.18 20.19 20.20 20.21 Blagojević 1983, p. 56.
  21. ↑ Katić & Vojvodić 2020, p. 131.
  22. ↑ Katić & Vojvodić 2020, p. 132.
  23. ↑ Katić & Vojvodić 2020, pp. 132–134, Ivanović 2023, p. 26
  24. ↑ Ivanović 2023, p. 26.
  25. ↑ Novaković 1979, p. 6.
  26. ↑ 26.0 26.1 26.2 Blagojević 1983, p. 68.
  27. ↑ 27.0 27.1 Blagojević 1983, pp. 68, 74.
  28. ↑ Blagojević 1996.
  29. ↑ 29.0 29.1 29.2 29.3 Blagojević 1983, p. 71.
  30. ↑ 30.0 30.1 30.2 30.3 30.4 Blagojević 1983, p. 70.
  31. ↑ Blagojević 1983, pp. 70–71.
  32. ↑ 32.0 32.1 Štetić 2016, p. 50.
  33. ↑ Blagojević 1983, pp. 69, 71, 74.
  34. ↑ 34.0 34.1 34.2 Blagojević 1983, pp. 71, 74.
  35. ↑ Blagojević 1983, pp. 69, 71.
  36. ↑ Blagojević 1983, p. 72.
  37. ↑ 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.3 Ivanović 2023, p. 24.
  38. ↑ Štetić 2023.
  39. ↑ 39.0 39.1 39.2 39.3 39.4 39.5 Ivanović 2023, p. 37.
  40. ↑ 40.0 40.1 Ivanović 2019.
  41. ↑ Ivanović 2023, pp. 34–35.
  42. ↑ Ivanović 2023, p. 35.
  43. ↑ 43.0 43.1 Mišić 2010.
  44. ↑ Blagojević 1983, pp. 53–54.

Sources

Further reading

  • Bojković, Gordan (2024). "Contribution to the studies of the Krajišta of the medieval Serbia: Krajišta of Petruš and Lipovac". Bastina (63). Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES): 331–337. doi:10.5937/bastina34-51487. ISSN 0353-9008.
  • Krstić, Aleksandar (2006). "Prvi osmanski defteri kao izvor za istorijsku geografiju srednjovekovnog Braničeva". Braničevski glasnik. 3–4.
  • Mišić, Siniša (2014). Историјска географија српских земаља: од 6. до половине 16. века. Магелан Прес. ISBN 978-86-88873-17-8.
  • Mišić, Siniša (2007). "Жупе Поморавље и Дубравница у средњем веку". In Aleksić, Dragan (ed.). Делиград од устанка ка независности: 1806-1876. : зборник радова са међународног научног скупа одржаног 2. септембра 2006. године у Алексинцу. Београд: Институт за новију историју Србије. pp. 1–7.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  • Mišić, Siniša (2010). "Петрушко и Липовачко крајиште од половине XIV века до 1459. године". Расин. ан. 8: 121–128.
  • Mišić, Siniša (2003). "Територијално-управна организација Полимља (XII-XIV век)". Краљ Владислав и Србија XIII века (Зборник радова; књ. 20): 73–87. ISBN 86-7743-030-X.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: periodical has ISBN (link)
  • Novaković, Bojan (2016). "Zemlje Dalmatinskih slovena". In Rudić, Srđan (ed.). Spomenica dr Tibora Živkovića [Homage to Tibor Živković]. Istorijski institut. pp. 129-. ISBN 978-86-7743-117-4.
  • Štetić, Marina (2016). "Алексиначки крај у средњем веку". Алексинац и околина у прошлости, 500 година од првог писаног помена 1516–2016, зборник радова са међународног научног скупа одржаног 3. септембра 2016. године у Алексинцу. Завичајни музеј Алексинац. pp. 49–63. ISBN 978-86-917433-6-9.
  • Štetić, Marina (2023). "Насеља у сливу Брегалнице под српском влашћу у средњем веку". Београдски историјски гласник. 14: 75–112.
This page contains text imported from the English Wikipedia (source revision 1370525893). Its authors are credited under CC BY-SA 4.0: see the attribution record.