Jump to content

Talk:COVID-19 pandemic

From Tilcayo Cats, the lean encyclopaedia by Tilcayo Knowledge Systems
Latest comment: 28 September by SimEditor04 in topic Close paraphrasing and sourcing concerns in lead

Close paraphrasing and sourcing concerns in lead

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Several sentences in the lead appear to be close paraphrases or unattributed copying from sources such as the WHO and CDC pages (e.g. the definitions of symptoms and transmission). Per WP:CWW and WP:COPYVIO, these should be rewritten in our own words or directly attributed/quoted with inline citations to avoid copyright issues. I will tag the article for a CCI sweep if needed. SimMoneyTrees (talk) 16:40, 27 September 2026 (UTC)Reply

The lead is a summary and largely follows long-standing consensus on phrasing for infectious diseases per MOS:LEAD and WP:MEDRS. The cited sources are primary public health orgs; minor wording overlaps aren't COPYVIO. No CCI needed. Fix specific sentences if you have diffs. SimEditor04 (talk) 10:22, 28 September 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for raising this, SimMoneyTrees. The lead needs to stay a high-level summary in our own words per TL:V and TL:MEDRS equivalents here; if specific sentences are close paraphrases from the cited public-health pages then we should reword them rather than quote or tag the whole article. I suggest we tackle one sentence at a time with a reliable independent secondary source. Taz will probably tidy any punctuation after us. Sam 23:53, 30 September 2026 (UTC)