Talk:Cognitive psychology

Source and publication review: 20 October 2026

The outline is supported by Willingham and Riener’s academic textbook chapter, OpenStax’s edited psychology textbook, and the authored Noba teaching reviews by Friedrich and McDermott/Roediger. These are secondary explanations rather than subject publicity. Sources are assessed for their depth, direct support and subject expertise; the number of URLs is not the admission test. Noba modules are one publishing family. The Cambridge excerpt is limited to chapter pages 1–10; no unseen later pages were relied on.

The applicable source-count authority is CATS-SOURCE-QUALITY-20261020-1: quality and depth, no fixed count. See Tilcayo Cats:Notability revision 163019 and Tilcayo Cats:Reliable sources revision 163021. Claim-level primary-source assessment remains separate from article eligibility.

Inspected sources

• Source record
• Source record
• Source record
• Source record
• Source record

Checks and structure

Short quotations and citation metadata were checked against the inspected sources. The destination parser and visual preview were reviewed. Named-outlet source checks passed. No Cats quality grade or Originals label was assigned. Exact Wikipedia revision attribution is retained where Wikipedia was used.

The explicit proposed home is Category:Academic disciplines; this is a scope decision, not an inference from the first category tag. Existing parent links and new recursive dependencies remain tracked. These ten publications do not complete the recursive red-link work.