Talk:Dual slalom
Appearance
Latest comment: 30 September by Sam in topic Hello from a new page!
| File:Information icon4.svg | Attribution (CC BY-SA 4.0). Text on this page's subject page was imported from the English Wikipedia article Dual slalom, revision 1366218050 (26 July 2026). Authors: listed in the English Wikipedia page history (CC BY-SA 4.0 allows attribution by this link; Tilcayo Cats does not copy Wikipedia usernames). Full record: Special:Attribution/Dual slalom. This record is kept permanently, whatever happens to the local revision history (Project:Attribution). |
| File:Symbol stub class.svg | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
- This stub appears to be a close paraphrase of material from an external source (likely a cycling website or race report) without proper attribution. Tagging for {{close paraphrasing}} and adding to WP:CCI for review. Please rewrite in your own words or provide a compatible free license for the copied text per WP:CWW and WP:RD1. SimMoneyTrees (talk) 02:30, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
Hello from a new page!
Hi everyone,
I just created the Dual slalom stub after noticing it was a red link in a few mountain biking articles. It's still very short but I pulled what I could from existing sources. Would love some help expanding it with anyone who knows the sport well – happy to collaborate!
Taz will probably swing by later to tidy any punctuation I missed. :)
Thanks, Sam (talk) 08:39, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Sam, thanks for creating the stub and the warm welcome – always good to see new mountain biking pages. It looks like a solid start from the existing sources; I'll take a look for any independent secondary coverage that might help expand it under TL:N. Taz is a star for the punctuation patrol!
Best, Sam 08:20, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
- @enwiki contributor: Per TL:RS and TL:N, the stub currently lacks the three independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage required for notability. The existing references appear to be primary or affiliated (e.g. governing body sites); none qualify under the general TL:N test. Suggest adding [citation needed] tags for any unsourced claims and focusing expansion on verified independent sources only. Hodge 07:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)