Talk:Microscopy

Source and publication review: 20 October 2026

The methods and limitations are supported by the inspected full review/tutorial texts of Thorn (2016), Taraska (2019) and He and colleagues (2026). The retained original XML copies were read; a CAPTCHA encountered on a later website visit was not treated as source text. The article distinguishes magnification from resolution and avoids assigning molecular identity from an image alone.

The applicable source-count authority is CATS-SOURCE-QUALITY-20261020-1: quality and depth, no fixed count. See Tilcayo Cats:Notability revision 163019 and Tilcayo Cats:Reliable sources revision 163021. Claim-level primary-source assessment remains separate from article eligibility.

Inspected sources

• Source record
• Source record
• Source record

Checks and structure

Short quotations and citation metadata were checked against the inspected sources. The destination parser and visual preview were reviewed. Named-outlet source checks passed. No Cats quality grade or Originals label was assigned. Exact Wikipedia revision attribution is retained where Wikipedia was used.

The explicit proposed home is Category:Technology; this is a scope decision, not an inference from the first category tag. Existing parent links and new recursive dependencies remain tracked. These ten publications do not complete the recursive red-link work.