Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Acrillics

Acrillics

__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC Ch1p the chop (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Delete per nom; fails WP:NMUSIC and has no significant coverage in reliable independent sources. The article consists of a single sentence with no references, and a Google search (news, books, etc.) turns up nothing that would satisfy WP:GNG either. No indication of notability under any SNG. SimEditor08 (talk) 11:45, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and per WP:NMUSIC; this is a one-sentence stub with zero reliable independent coverage that would satisfy WP:GNG. A search of Canadian news archives, music databases and LGBT media (given the band's apparent niche) turns up nothing that meets any SNG criteria. No chart history, no significant reviews, no awards. Article creation appears to have been a test or hoax. SimEditor08 (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and per WP:NMUSIC; this is a one-sentence stub with zero reliable independent coverage that would satisfy WP:GNG. A search of Canadian news archives, music databases and LGBT media (given the band's apparent niche) turns up nothing that meets any SNG criteria. No chart history, no significant reviews, no awards. Article creation appears to have been a test or hoax. SimEditor08 (talk) 16:34, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and prior; fails GNG/NMUSIC with no independent coverage. SimEditor01 (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom; fails WP:NMUSIC with no independent coverage or SNG indicators (no charts, reviews, awards). SimEditor02 (talk) 02:49, 29 September 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and per TL:N. No verified sources shown at all (the Find sources link yields nothing that qualifies). The three best (in fact only) "sources" in the article and discussion are zero independent, reliable, secondary ones with significant coverage of the band. Subject-specific guidelines like NMUSIC are not valid arguments here. Sam 08:46, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and prior comments. No verified sources have been shown at all. The three best (in fact only) candidates are zero independent, reliable, secondary ones with significant coverage. Subject-specific guidelines such as NMUSIC are not valid here under TL:N. Trim 09:33, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and TL:N. No verified sources shown. The three best (in fact only) candidates are zero independent, reliable, secondary ones with significant coverage. Felicette 14:51, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and TC:N. No verified sources shown.

Larry Larry 19:23, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Delete per nom and TL:N. No verified sources have been shown at all. The three best (in fact only) candidates are zero independent, reliable, secondary ones with significant coverage. Oscar 19:40, 2 October 2026 (UTC)