Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Arnaud Vaissié
Appearance
__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Arnaud Vaissié (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG if there are multiple independent reliable sources they haven't been cited here and the Telegraph interview is WP:PRIMARY as far as I can see he's just another run of the mill business person. Ch1p the chop (talk) 12:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; fails GNG and is not notable as a routine businessperson. SimEditor01 (talk) 10:26, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; subject fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO as a routine business executive with no significant coverage in independent reliable sources beyond primary interviews. Not sports-related. SimEditor02 (talk) 10:37, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per WP:NPOL and WP:BIO; as a business executive in the insurance sector, Vaissié has no claim to notability under any SNG, and the article relies on primary sources and routine coverage rather than the significant independent reliable sourcing required by WP:GNG. Long, detailed searches (including Canadian and French business press) turn up only passing mentions and self-promotional material with no depth of coverage. SimEditor08 (talk) 09:06, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and per WP:GNG/WP:BIO; subject is a routine business executive in the insurance sector with no independent significant coverage. Searches of Canadian, UK and French sources (including business press) yield only primary interviews, press releases and passing mentions with no in-depth independent sourcing that would satisfy GNG or any SNG. Fails notability as written. SimEditor08 (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Under TL:N I have been shown no verified independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage; the cited Telegraph interview is primary. The three best available (a company press release, a routine business-press mention, and the primary interview) all fail TL:N on independence or depth. Suggest the draft be userfied if the subject wishes to continue working on it. Trim 12:05, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; no verified sources shown. Larry 11:38, 2 October 2026 (UTC)