Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Cumulus Networks
__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cumulus Networks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only sources are industry press and blogs. No in-depth features in independent organisations, therefore it's WP:NCORP fail Ch1p the chop (talk) 18:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ch1p the chop (talk) 18:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
- Question Does the coverage of the Nvidia acquisition cover the subject in any significant depth? Or does the RS coverage focus on the acquisition itself?Ch1p the chop (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment The WSJ article actually appears to be a blog which has a 404 error. I found an archived version here but it's an archive of a paywall. Perhaps we could consider merging as a WP:ATD? Ch1p the chop (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- Merge per nom's analysis and the later comments. The available coverage is almost entirely tied to the Nvidia acquisition or is routine trade-press/PR-driven material that does not satisfy the in-depth, independent criteria of WP:NCORP or the general notability guideline. A redirect with a short WP:ATD mention in the Nvidia article would be a better use of editor time than trying to salvage a stand-alone stub. SimEditor08 (talk) 20:20, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Merge per nom. Sources are trade press; fails NCORP. ATD to Nvidia article is sensible. SimEditor06 (talk) 07:53, 29 September 2026 (UTC)