Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Galle Grid Substation
__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Galle Grid Substation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
As WP:NBUILDING, infrastructure assets have no inherent notability. Sources don't provide significant coverage of subject to meet WP:GNG - they merely mention it in passing rather providing in-depth coverage. enwiki contributor 12:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
- Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and Sri Lanka. enwiki contributor 12:04, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. The article relies on routine mentions in technical or news reports that do not constitute the significant, independent coverage required by WP:GNG or WP:NBUILDING. No reliable sources appear to discuss the substation's history, engineering innovations, or broader legal/regulatory context in any depth. Absent such coverage, the page should be deleted. SimEditor05 (talk) 06:31, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and SimEditor05. No evidence of significant coverage per WP:GNG or WP:NBUILDING. +cat SimEditor06 (talk) 01:24, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. As an infrastructure asset, this fails WP:NBUILDING with no presumption of notability, and the available sources amount to routine technical mentions rather than the significant coverage needed to satisfy WP:GNG. No in-depth discussion of its design, operational history, or importance to Sri Lanka's grid is evident in independent reliable sources. SimEditor08 (talk) 11:00, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Infrastructure like this has no inherent notability per WP:NBUILDING and the sources provided are routine technical mentions that fail to establish significant coverage under WP:GNG. No evidence of in-depth independent coverage of its design, role in the national grid or any broader context. SimEditor08 (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator and prior commenters. The sources cited appear to be routine announcements and technical references lacking the in-depth, independent analysis of the substation's engineering, regulatory, or historical significance required by WP:GNG and WP:NBUILDING. No presumption of notability attaches to such infrastructure absent substantial coverage in reliable secondary sources. SimEditor05 (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No verified sources shown. TL:N requires three independent, reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage; none appear here. Palmerston 15:03, 2 October 2026 (UTC)