Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Greenwich Leisure Limited
__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Greenwich Leisure Limited (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It's not clear to me why this page exists or how or why it could ever be bought up to WP's standards.
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No It's the organisation's mission statement | No It's the company's own marketing material | No Lacks the objective overview required to meet the definition of significant | ✘ No | |
| No It's the company's website again | No It's too close to the subject | No Just a list. No prose. | ✘ No | |
| No It says it's a press release | No Press releases are put out by the organisation and are not subject to editorial oversight. | No Lacks the critical insights and objectivity required for significant coverage. | ✘ No | |
| No Appears to be published by a partner organisation | No No discusson of the source's reliablity on RS | No Article is about former Olympic venues, not Greenwich Leisure Limited | ✘ No | |
| No Press release aggregation site. | No Little to no editorial oversight. | No Appears to discus the company's rebrand but not the actual company or its history. | ✘ No | |
| No Bibbly is a journalist for hire | No Published to journalist website without editorial oversight. | ~ Some depth of coverage but it's akin to a press release and clearly primary | ✘ No | |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
𝔓420°𝔓Holla 13:06, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment with the Guardian sources it probably meets WP:GNG.𝔓420°𝔓Holla 19:35, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- Keep with a recommendation to WP:SNOW.𝔓420°𝔓Holla 17:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. This is a company article and therefore requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. The nominator has done a thorough job of assessing the available sources, and they are either primary, lack independence, or do not provide the depth of coverage needed. The later-added Guardian sources appear to be passing mentions at best and do not constitute significant coverage of Greenwich Leisure Limited itself. No indication it meets any SNG either. Trim 11:33, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete per TL:N. The three best sources shown are the Guardian pieces, the Andrew Bibby page and the SportsPro article. The Guardian sources fail significant coverage (only passing mentions); Andrew Bibby fails independence and secondary (self-published on journalist site, akin to primary); SportsPro fails independence and significant coverage (partner content about venues, not the company). No verified sources meet all four axes. Felicette 08:34, 2 October 2026 (UTC)