Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Life (UK organisation)
Appearance
__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Life (UK organisation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page subsisted on the organisation's website. I trimmed it back to its secondary sources. Alas, no significant depth, just significant rs dearth. It appears the rs' cover the organisation's various controversies but the coverage doesn't feature this page's subject. There's a little more sig cov surrounding the Tampon tax controversy but to spin it into anything more than a stub would involve barrel scraping. Eichhornia Crassipes (talk) 17:59, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
- comment It's not really significant coverage. If anything, they're an extra in story about how the UK government allocated the funds. I got these results by putting "Life" + Tampon Tax site:theguardian.com into Google. So do you think this subject is broad enough for the three pages it currently occupies? Life (UK organisation), Jack Scarisbrick, Nuala Scarisbrick. I'll vote keep if you can convince me it has enough GNG to stand as a separate subject to its founders.Eichhornia Crassipes (talk) 12:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)