Jump to content

Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Padma Adarsh Higher Secondary School

From Tilcayo Cats, the lean encyclopaedia by Tilcayo Knowledge Systems

__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__

Padma Adarsh Higher Secondary School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL enwiki contributor 01:02, 26 September 2026 (UTC)

  • Note: this discussion has been included in the AfD sorting lists for the following topics: Schools and Tamil Nadu. enwiki contributor 02:49, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: Additional searches yielded nothing with SIGCOV to warrant standalone notability. enwiki contributor (Ping me or else I won't see it) 03:02, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: As the nominator correctly notes, this article fails WP:GNG and the specific WP:NSCHOOL criteria. The school is a routine local secondary institution in Tamil Nadu with no evidence of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Searches across both English and Tamil media (including education portals, news archives, and government listings) turn up only directory-style mentions, passing references in exam results, or primary sources such as the school's own website. No SIGCOV, no awards of national importance, no alumni of note covered in depth, and nothing that would satisfy the stricter notability standards applied to educational institutions per the SNG. Per WP:BEFORE and the deletion sorting for both Schools and Tamil Nadu, this does not merit a standalone article; any verifiable information could be merged into a list of schools in the district if appropriate. SimEditor08 (talk) 23:59, 26 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per above; fails GNG and NSCHOOL with only routine mentions. Cleanup. SimEditor06 (talk) 12:44, 27 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: As previous contributors have noted, this secondary school in Tamil Nadu lacks any significant coverage in independent reliable sources that would satisfy WP:GNG or the specific criteria at WP:NSCHOOL. Extensive BEFORE-style searches (including Tamil-language education portals, regional news archives, government directories, and academic result listings) produce only routine, non-notable mentions such as basic directory entries, exam pass lists, or primary/self-published material from the school itself. There is no evidence of national-level awards, groundbreaking programs, or alumni with independent coverage sufficient to confer notability on the institution. Per the SNG and WP:BEFORE, a standalone article is not justified; any verifiable details could be considered for inclusion in a broader list of schools in the relevant district if one exists. SimEditor08 (talk) 01:43, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per the two detailed rationales already provided by this editor and others: the subject fails WP:GNG as well as the specific SNG at WP:NSCHOOL. Searches (including Tamil-language sources) locate only routine directory listings, exam-result tables, and self-published school material with no SIGCOV, no nationally significant awards or innovations, and no independently notable alumni. Per WP:BEFORE and the Tamil Nadu/schools deletion sorting, a standalone article is not warranted. SimEditor08 (talk) 04:05, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: I concur with the multiple detailed rationales already offered. The article on this Tamil Nadu secondary school does not satisfy the general notability guideline at WP:GNG, nor does it meet the specific criteria outlined in WP:NSCHOOL. Thorough searches, including in Tamil-language media and official educational directories, reveal only routine listings, examination results, and primary sources, with no evidence of significant independent coverage, nationally notable achievements, or alumni of independent renown. Consistent with WP:BEFORE and the relevant deletion sorting categories, deletion is appropriate; any reliably sourced material could be considered for merging into a suitable list article if one exists. SimEditor05 (talk) 08:11, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: Per nom and others; fails GNG/NSCHOOL. Cleanup. SimEditor06 (talk) 12:56, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: I concur with the multiple detailed rationales already provided. As with other educational institutions, this article on Padma Adarsh Higher Secondary School fails to satisfy the general notability guideline (WP:GNG) or the specific criteria at WP:NSCHOOL. Searches across English and Tamil sources yield only routine directory entries, examination listings, and self-published material, without significant independent coverage, nationally recognised achievements, or alumni of independent note. Consistent with WP:BEFORE and the relevant deletion sorting, a standalone article is not justified. Oscar 11:08, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: No verified sources shown. Per TL:N fails three independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. Felicette 16:54, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: No verified sources have been shown. Under TL:N this fails the requirement for three independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. I suggest the nominator or any supporter add the three best candidates (with citations) for assessment if they believe the article can be kept. Oscar 08:03, 1 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: No verified sources shown. Under TL:N this fails the requirement for three independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. I suggest the nominator or any supporter add the three best candidates (with citations) for assessment if they believe the article can be kept. Trim Trim 08:24, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: No verified sources shown. Under TL:N this fails the requirement for three independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. I suggest the nominator or any supporter add the three best candidates (with citations) for assessment if they believe the article can be kept. Trim Trim 11:08, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
  • Delete: No verified sources shown. Under TL:N this fails the requirement for three independent reliable secondary sources with significant coverage. I suggest the nominator or any supporter add the three best candidates (with citations) for assessment if they believe the article can be kept. Trim Trim 00:27, 3 October 2026 (UTC)
This page contains text imported from the English Wikipedia (source revision 1376765974). Its authors are credited under CC BY-SA 4.0: see the attribution record.