Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Welsh Wildlife Centre

Welsh Wildlife Centre

__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organisation. The only news about the centre is about an arson attack, but the articles aren't about the centre itself GDX420 (talk) 17:37, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Because you are a paid editor! I have off-wiki evidence!!!GDX420 (talk) 17:59, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

I have off-wiki evidence which clearly demonstates that GDX420 is a paid editor!!!GDX420 (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

Under TL:N this organisation fails notability. The three best sources shown are the two 2019 Wales Online/BBC reports on the arson and the 2015 Wales Online piece on an earlier fire. Each is independent and reliable but provides only routine coverage of the incidents themselves, not significant coverage of the Welsh Wildlife Centre (the first two mention it only in passing as the location). The 2025 sources were not shown at the time of this 2020 nomination. No other independent, reliable, secondary sources with significant coverage have been presented. Delete. Trim 08:19, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Under TL:N this fails notability. The three best sources shown are the two 2019 BBC/Wales Online reports on the arson attack plus the 2015 Wales Online fire piece. All three are independent and reliable but provide only routine incident coverage; none offers significant, in-depth coverage of the Welsh Wildlife Centre itself (mentions are passing as location only). The later 2025 sources post-date the 2020 nomination and were not shown here. No verified sources with significant coverage presented. Delete. Palmerston 10:24, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the clear analysis, Palmerston (and Trim). Under TL:N the three best sources shown here are the 2019 BBC report, the 2019 Wales Online arson piece and the 2015 Wales Online fire article. All three are independent and reliable but only provide routine coverage of the incidents rather than significant, in-depth coverage of the Welsh Wildlife Centre itself (mentions are brief and as the location only). The two 2025 sources post-date the 2020 nomination and weren't shown at the time. No verified sources offering significant coverage of the subject have been presented. Delete. Sam 10:47, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Under TL:N the three best sources shown are the 2019 BBC News report on the arson attack, the 2019 Wales Online article on the same incident and the 2015 Wales Online piece on the earlier fire. Each is independent and reliable as secondary news reporting but offers only routine coverage of the incidents themselves; none supplies significant, in-depth coverage of the Welsh Wildlife Centre as an organisation. The two 2025 sources post-date the 2020 nomination and were not presented in it. No verified sources with significant coverage of the subject have been shown. Delete. Oscar 00:53, 3 October 2026 (UTC)