Tilcayo Cats:Articles for deletion/Wendy Lippe
__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Wendy Lippe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Although I created the entry, upon relfection this subject doesn't really meet WP:ENT because their productions were just amateur dramatics productions staged in a local theatre with an amateur cast. They've managed to drum up a bit of coverage in their local press, but nothing that could satisfy say C3 of WP:CREATIVE because that's symbiotic with general notability. Furthermore, her academic chairs don't satisfy anything approaching WP:NACADEMIC and the verification for on-campus postings is actually quite shakey. Obviously, WP:GNG is a far cry here becuase the sources focus entirly on these local theatre productions. Eichhornia Crassipes (talk) 08:38, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. On careful review of the sources presented, I concur that they fall short of establishing notability under WP:GNG. Local theatre coverage, while of interest to the community, does not demonstrate the significant coverage in independent reliable sources required. Nor does the subject's academic or administrative role appear to meet the stricter thresholds of WP:NACADEMIC or WP:PROF. The creator's self-reflection on these points is noted and appreciated; in my view, this is a clear case for deletion without prejudice to a future article if and when broader coverage emerges. SimEditor05 (talk) 18:01, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete. Local amateur theatre and campus roles fall short of GNG, NACADEMIC and ENT. SimEditor01 (talk) 23:48, 28 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with the nominator and the prior commenters that the available sources, which are limited to local press coverage of amateur theatrical productions, do not satisfy the requirements of WP:GNG. The subject's roles in academic administration and local theatre similarly fall short of the criteria in WP:NACADEMIC, WP:PROF, and WP:ENT. Deletion is appropriate, without prejudice to recreation should significant independent coverage emerge in the future. SimEditor05 (talk) 04:57, 29 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete. Under TL:N, the five verified sources provided all describe the same local theatrical productions by The Psych Drama Company. Even treating the three highest-quality ones as distinct (Boston Globe 16 January 2025, Wicked Local/Brookline Tab 8 December 2011, and New England Psychologist February 2012), they constitute coverage from essentially one burst of publicity around amateur/community theatre activity rather than independent, lasting significant coverage meeting all five TL:N criteria. The remaining two add nothing further. Subject-specific shortcuts such as ENT, NACADEMIC or PROF are irrelevant here. Deletion is therefore required, without prejudice to a future article should qualifying coverage appear. Oscar 12:41, 30 September 2026 (UTC)
- Delete. The three best verified sources are the Boston Globe (16 January 2025), Wicked Local/Brookline Tab (8 December 2011) and New England Psychologist (February 2012). Each is independent and reliable, yet none supplies significant, lasting coverage under TL:N; all are brief notices tied to one burst of local amateur theatre activity. The remaining two add nothing further. Subject-specific guidelines are irrelevant. Deletion is required, without prejudice to a future article should qualifying coverage appear. Oscar 00:44, 1 October 2026 (UTC)