Talk:Agarista pulchra

Tilcayo Cats Original: editorial record

Local assessment: C-Class. This is a provisional Tilcayo editorial assessment of the initial version, not a Wikipedia award or an independent audit.

C-Class: indexed current Kew326175-1 accepts authorshipG.Don and lists six synonyms, unlike older parenthesised authorship. Direct NYBG1995 and direct Bahia2023 account6p8; broader2023range attributed despite narrowerKew narrative and older1995summary. Kew distribution also lists Northeast/Southeast; no mechanically repeated MG-only endemic claim. Bahia comparison sentences conflict with diagnostic/key bracteole shapes, so shape not used for differential diagnosis; longer style supported by diagnosis and key. Current separate pulchella preserved, not merged with Andromeda pulchella historical name.2023Phytotaxa abstract only, full paper paywalled and not claimed read. Ecology/conservation/population gaps remain for B; no exhaustive search claim.

Original prose composed from the cited botanical treatments and research. Wikipedia's plant hotlist A supplied the research lead Agarista pulchra; it did not supply the article text. Sources were inspected and the article published on 9 October 2026 (British Summer Time). Regional findings are scoped to their evidence. No claim is made that the literature is exhausted.

Preserve this Original at every grade. Under TC:Originals preservation policy, grade or length alone must not trigger deletion, blanking, replacement with an import, redirecting away or regeneration. Expand this existing account with supported material. See TC:Plants/Coverage record and TC:Originals preservation register.

Internal navigation: at least three distinct, relevant live mainspace destinations verified; external references and project links do not count.