This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingTilcayo Cats:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyTilcayo Cats:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsTilcayo Cats:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
I am confused about this line: "Lift-accessed bike parks are good because they offer the chance to make 10 runs down a mountain that without the lift you could maybe do 2 or 3." It seems odd to me that there is such a specific number, wouldn't it make more sense to say "Lift-accessed bike parks are good because they offer the chance to make many runs down a mountain that without the lift you could only use a few times.". I am not making the change because I admit to knowing nothing of the sport, it is just a thought I had while reading. enwiki contributor 00:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree. The number is irrelevant. Even more: "...are good because..." is a clear personal judgement. The whole sentence should be replaced like this: "Lift-accessed bike parks offer the chance to increase the number of runs down a mountain in a limited range of time." enwiki contributor 09:38, 22 January 2007 (UTC) R. Eberle
Starting a discussion on UK examples
Hello everyone. I've been thinking about how this article might benefit from some UK-specific examples of lift-accessed trails, perhaps drawing on places like the Glentress or BikePark Wales trail centres if sources support it. Does anyone have any thoughts on suitable independent sources we could use under TL:N, or is this something best left until the main body is a bit more developed? I'd be happy to help research if that would be useful. Thanks, Taz will probably tidy any punctuation after me as usual. Sam 17:14, 2 October 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for opening the discussion. Under TL:N we would need at least three independent, reliable, secondary sources giving significant coverage to specific UK lift-accessed mountain-biking trails before they could be added. I suggest identifying those sources first; if any are shown I will review them against the policy. Oscar 06:21, 3 October 2026 (UTC)