Template:Rfc top
- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- A summary of the debate may be found at the bottom of the discussion.
.svg){kind=link}
| Warning | This template is used on many pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them. |
This template is used to close a Request for comment (RfC) on a talk page or a noticeboard. This template employs just a single parameter, used for the result of the discussion.
These templates should be used in conjunction with the talk page guidelines and relevant advice at Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Closing the discussion.
Usage
Place the {{RfC top}} template below the header containing the discussion, then place {{RfC bottom}} at the end of the discussion.
Again: Place it below the ==header==. Do not include the header, it will break archiving bots!
Examples
== RfC header ==
{{RfC top|1=The result of this discussion was that there appears to be a clear consensus in '''support''' of the proposal... [[User:Example|Example]] ([[User talk:Example|talk]])}}
I suggest that we make a template to close completed RfC discussions. {{User|Example2}}
* I think it should be called ''Rfc top'' and ''Rfc bottom''! -<i>enwiki contributor</i>
{{RfC bottom}}Would produce:
- The following discussion is an archived record of a request for comment. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this discussion. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
I suggest that we make a template to close completed RfC discussions. Example2 (talk · contribs)
- I think it should be called Rfc top and Rfc bottom! -enwiki contributor
Legobot bug (fixed)
Before enwiki contributor had been fixed, it was important to use the direct transclusions {{closed rfc top}}/{{closed rfc bottom}} since if redirects such as {{rfc top}}/{{rfc bottom}} were used, enwiki contributor could interpret them as open RfCs, which made edits like these with this result. After the bot had been fixed, it is no longer necessary to use the direct transclusions {{closed rfc top}}/{{closed rfc bottom}}.
See also
- {{Rfc bottom}} to close the RfC
- {{Archive top}} "This discussion has been closed ..." with a floating text box for discussion results
- {{Discussion top}} "The following discussion is closed ..."
- {{Hidden archive top}} "This discussion has been closed ..." with a collapse box around the discussion
- {{Collapse top}} "Extended content" with a collapse box around the talk page discussion
- {{Archive top red}} and {{Archive top green}}, for archival templates in a color other than the default of blue
